CHAPTER 1C | ||
Topic | Case | Brief Desription |
Domestic/ social à w/o Intention to Create Legal Relation | Balfour v Balfour [1919] 2 KB 571 | 夫外地工作承諾每月寄妻生活費,其後離婚夫停付,妻告法庭,官判無 consideration 故無 contract to bind,即使有,也沒有 intention for legal relationship. |
Domestic/ social à w/o Intention to Create Legal Relation | Jones v Padavatton CA [1969] [1969] 1 WLR 328, [1969] 2 All ER 616 | 母付費予女往英讀法,後再承諾買屋給女,其後母在女還未畢業就收回屋,女告上法庭,官判無 contract 因雙方無 intention to create legal relations |
Domestic/ social à with Intention to Create Legal Relation | Merritt v Merritt [1970] 1 WLR 1211 | 夫妻離婚期間搞協議,夫承諾給贍養費,其後反悔,妻告法庭,官判協議 binding,因認為在已破裂的關係下所作之協議,會希望劃清界線,故會有 intention to create legal relationship |
Domestic/ social à with Intention to Create Legal Relation | Simpkins v Pays [1955] 1 WLR 975
|
三女參與報載比賽,由其中一女將各人之投件一拼投寄報館,其中一人之投件勝出,該女不肯三人攤分獎金,官判該 agreement to ‘go shares’ has intention to create legal relationship |
Domestic/ social à with Intention to Create Legal Relation | Parker v Clark [1960] 1 WLR 286 | 年輕夫婦賣屋搬往老親戚同住以便照顧,老親戚承諾其屋歸夫婦擁有。The old relatives broke the promise subsequently |
Commercial – with intention | Edwards v Skyways Ltd [1964] 1 WLR 349 | 航空公司解僱機師承諾 voluntary補償 (ex gratia) |
Commercial – with intention | Ma Ip Hung v Lai Chuen t/a Kin Hing Factory[1957] HKLR 32 | |
Commercial – honourable pledge clause | Rose and Frank Co v J R Crompton & Brothers Ltd [1925] AC 445 | 兩人次協議包函 honourable pledge clause指該協議無法律效應,HL 判honourable pledge clause 可令協議 no legal binding但只適用於 general framework agreement 而不適用該agreement 當下之particular order ,故該 order仍是 legal binding |